I say GAFF
Post Your Comments
Posted by no on June 6, 2007 at 7:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Ortiz is such a joke! Guess he finnally learned that it's the public he should listen to, not the puppet-master. Oh well, hopefully he's a one-term wonder....sure definitely seems to be on track to be one.
Posted by guest on June 6, 2007 at 8:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Makes you wonder if something spooked then into backing out on the bill, time will tell. Looking forward to the Caller Times in keeping us informed.
Posted by stff on June 6, 2007 at 8:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
He's your boy Caller Times. You endorsed him. But like you always endorse his daddy after it's been revealed he's been involved in funny stuff, you'll continue to endorse Jr. The editorial board's interest is preserving the Democrat Party in Nueces County, not open and honest government as it likes everyone to believe.
Posted by mychbelle on June 6, 2007 at 8:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is what happens when registered voters make uneducated decisions and vote for a name rather than considering a candidate's true qualifications for the job in which he seeks. Now we're stuck with an imbecile representative who can't even pretend to know what he's doing. He rode his father's coattails all the way to the statehouse and now we're paying for it. We can only hope and pray that he'll do relatively little damage the rest of his term in office, and maybe more intelligent voters'll stand up next time.
Posted by truthincc on June 6, 2007 at 9:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The next election will be the true test as it will speak a great deal about the voters if they vote to send him back.
Posted by mondosurf77 on June 6, 2007 at 9:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
At least he is backing off these pieces of legislation when the public expresses that they do not approve of them. I'd rather have an official who does that than the smartest man/woman in the world that does not listen to the people. Overall, it would be nice to have an intelligent, experienced person who listens to the people...but you are only limited to the candidates that run for office, right?
Posted by cwaller on June 6, 2007 at 9:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey, the boy backed off the legislation, which makes him look silly, but shows that he will change when there is public disapproval. At least the guy listens to the public and acts on it.
Posted by mike.carter on June 6, 2007 at 10:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Good for Rep. Ortiz. He makes a mistake and admits it and does something about it. Wish we could say the same for the President of the United States.
Posted by df61743 on June 6, 2007 at 11:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The jerks that sent him up there are the same jerks that kept sending his useless daddy back, and they will send him back again. Apparently they aren't smart enough to read about what he's doing. The name is all they need to know!
Posted by dthompson on June 6, 2007 at 11:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The CCCT seems to only report the 'bad' things that Rep. Ortiz is doing. If and when they ever post anything good he's done, it's a small blurp on a back page. The CCCT receives the same press releases that Ortiz's constituents and supporters are able to receive. If the Caller Times were to report on all of his accomplishments within his first 6 months in office then they'd really be keeping us informed.
Posted by browardjoe on June 6, 2007 at 11:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Its a joke and he is a joke of a legislator. There are state reps that go decades without screw ups like this and he did this in his first session. Unbelievable. His father can do this stuff and never get called on it and this newspaper continues to endorse him...another joke. Anyone ever figure out that there has been a senior congressman, a county judge, a county commissioner, and now a state rep hail from Robstown since 1982 and it still looks like a third world country over there? When our citizens are going to wake up is beyond me. Hes trying to do 'under the table,' shoddy deals like his dad, but thank goodness he is too stupid to even pull them off.
Posted by usaf7191 on June 6, 2007 at 11:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Carter,
It appears to me that Representative Ortiz did not admit to making a mistake until after the public raised and eyebrow or two about his actions. Both this time and also when he accepted a bill from his uncle and submitted it without even reading it to the legislature for consideration.
Who in his right mind would introduce a bill giving (tax dollar paid)benefits to people who volunteered to be RTA Board Members.
Last time I checked Volunteer meant to perform or offer to perform a service of one's own free will without expecting to be compensated.
Posted by marybelltx on June 6, 2007 at 2:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Someone should look into other deals that the RTA has done?
I read that they each have a personal expense accounts for travel to conventions and other "informational" seminars. Is that "on the job training" or "vacation time" at taxpayer expense?
What is really going on at the RTA that the public is unaware of?
Let's get some true volunteers who believe in public service at the RTA.
I remember that political ad portraying Ortiz Jr. as a puppet. At the time I thought it to be very mean spirited, however now one has to wonder just how many strings really tied to Jr.? I'm very disappointed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCXYGsChu...
Posted by nick.wetegrove on June 6, 2007 at 2:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The real joke is the Caller-Times. Had the newspaper had any interest in reporting the real news they would have noted the needle exchange legislation that Rep. Ortiz got passed that will protect our police officers from contracting HIV. Also, don't worry about mentioning his work on the CHIP bill to get thousands of more Texas children insured.
Posted by marybelltx on June 6, 2007 at 3:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The bill you are referring to is only one of 13 bills that died. Only 3 bills were passed by Representative Ortiz in 5 months. The RTA bill, a county pay raise bill, and a access to records bill. My niece showed me how to find this information and she is 16.
I would think that you would take the time to check your facts. Let me assist you in your endeavor to educate yourself.
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/Search/Bi...
Posted by nick.wetegrove on June 6, 2007 at 5:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you for your kind offering. As you are probably unfamiliar with the true workings of the legislative process let me assist you. The Republican opposition to any form of needle exchange bill was very intense this legislative session. Had you investigated further you would have noticed that HB 1846 was referred to the Public Health Committee which is chaired by Rep. Diane Delisi, who was a 2001 Texas Eagle Forum Freedom and Family Award winner. Additional inquiry would have led you to realize that the Eagle Forum is a group affiliated with Phyllis Schlafly, a woman that wrote a book against the Equal Rights Amendment, and encourages "conservative participation in public policy". Certainly Rep. Delisi could not go back to her constituents and tell them she voted for a bill that would give intravenous drug users access to needles. That certainly does not sound deserving of the Freedom and Family Award. But wait -- Rep. Delisi never had a chance to vote on the bill because as chair of the committee she ultimately decides which bills her committee will hear and she did not want to hear this one. Maybe your niece should have informed you of that. Furthermore, a true detective like yourself I am sure would have watched the debate on SB 10, you would have noticed that it was amended to create a pilot needle exchange program in Bexar county. Rep. Ortiz and his staff's work towards this compromise is also something else you won't read in the Caller. The other bill I assume you are cross referencing with me is HB 710. Rep. Ortiz filed this bill in conjunction with at least 15 other members. Despite opposition, this bill passed in a different form (HB 109 I believe) and as a result 127,000 more children are now insured. Next time you should probably consult someone other than your niece or your government textbook. Maybe then you would realize there are dozens of different ways for great ideas like this from Rep. Ortiz to make it into law. That is what it's all about right? Helping the people of Texas. Good job Rep. Ortiz.
Best wishes during your endeavor to educate yourself on the realities of politics and government.
Posted by raquel.premier on June 6, 2007 at 6:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think Rep.Ortiz, is doing a fantasic job....There will be tons of issues that we the public will not agree on, we don't realize that he has given alot of his time and energy for the citizens here and has given up more than he will probably ever gain... He has accomplished alot and I am an glad he represents CC...Once again we are talking about people in corpus that dont get involved and are the first to have a negative comment...
Keep up the good work Rep.Ortiz!!!
Posted by marybelltx on June 6, 2007 at 7:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That was a round about way of saying that he had a bill which became and amendment of which he doesn't even have his name on but it supposably was passed in to law BY HIM? 18 amendments and I didn't see Ortiz listed.
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLooku...
The statement was that "needle exchange legislation that Rep. Ortiz got passed " where does it say he passed it?
I never read that he was an author or co-author in the house.
And where did protection of law enforcement come into play? Was that just your interpretation?
I applaud anyone who is a public servant including teachers but don't make a statement that something was accomplished or passed when it simply is not the case. 3 bills were passed by Ortiz the RTA, the County, the notification bill
If you can provide the link where it shows where he provided that amendment we would certainly like to read that. And will gladly admit that I made a mistake. I'm only a teacher but research is not that difficult.
Posted by el_longhorn on June 6, 2007 at 7:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey marybelltx, Ortiz is a CO-AUTHOR of HB 109, the CHIP bill that restores health insurance to thousands of kids in Texas and that you like so much. In addition to his 3 bills, Ortiz also passed 3 amendments and sponsored one senate bill...pretty good for a freshman who is in the minority party and voted against Speaker Craddick! Look it all up. Compare his accomplishments to any freshman Democrat. He did very well.
On needle exchange, why don't you ask the ACLU or the Coastal Bend AIDS Foundation what they think about Ortiz's efforts on legalizing needle exchange programs? By the way, law enforcement supports needle exchange because they don't want to get stuck with a dirty needle when patting someone down.
Posted by miguelmba1 on June 7, 2007 at 1:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Another example of the corrupt politics of Nueces County. We need to cut the Puppet's strings!
Posted by marybelltx on June 7, 2007 at 1:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
My issue is not with Ortiz but with the RTA.
If I was Ortiz my concern is who is hurting him and/or who is helping him. The people who put him in this position must have another motive. No idiot would not think of what the fallout would be. RIGHT?
TO me Ortiz Jr. is the victim of people may have intentionally manipulated him in order to put him in that position to be at the minimum vulnerable to defeat in the upcoming election.
Since you are primarily concerned with Ortiz and cannot see beyond that. Answer a question for me
OF THE 16 BILLS THAT HE AUTHORED HOW MANY WERE PASSED?
OF THE BILLS THAT WERE PASSED HOW MANY WERE SPECIAL INTEREST BILLS AND/OR FILED RELATED TO A FAMILY MEMBER?
Question
Why wouldn't he pass a county bill to another member of the delegation to avoid the perception of impropriety.
I guess he would rather do it "in" the taxpayers "face" than try and hide it.
To my little people aka "the minority"
When did it become about the one and not the many?
Politics is about building bridges and helping the people who deserve helped and truly deserve help.
It was said earlier that Rep. Oriz made a mistake and he corrected it. And for that I understand. I feel that the Caller deserves the same respect in that it endorsed the Congressman's son and in MY opionion the CALLER should be extended the same courtesy and rescind it's endorsement of Ortiz, Jr. for... well doing absolutely nothing.
WE VOTED YOU IN AND I VOTED FOR YOU. WHAT DID YOU DO? FOR CORPUS? TELL US PLEASE.
RTA
Why cant the Caller tell us what these RTA people really do and what the qualifications are?
I would like to have a travel expense account, a title, be able to vote on millions of dollars of taxpayer money and NOT HAVE TO BE ELECTED. Wait it's "our" tax money they are spending.
NOW HOW DO I BECOME ONE OF THESE CHIEFTAINS?
No comments:
Post a Comment