Friday, May 25, 2007

CCISD: Why are CCISD Students allowed to run at large during school day hours?

CCISD: Why are CCISD Students allowed to run at large during school day hours?



Education is for our Children, our Youth, our Future. Children and Youth need constant redirection and set boundaries at home and at school as well. When a minor is allowed to run at large during the school day hours whether it is in the halls, leaving or returning a closed campus or simply unaccounted for is irresponsible of the caretaker whose custody in which he / she is placed.
Kenedeno



An absent student is one who does not arrive at school in the morning and is absent for the WHOLE Day. The student was never on campus. The Parent is responsible for the student getting to school (requiring the student to attend school). If the student does not get to school it is the Parent’s responsibility not necessarily the Parent’s fault. There are circumstances where the student will walk in the front door and out the back door without attending a single class. This is where the attendance officers need to improve their due diligence like the old days.

Once the student is counted present in the morning; the Parent has required the student (child) to attend school. Once the student is verified in attendance at the beginning of the school day the student is in the custody of the School.

If the student is tardy or skips class (on campus or off campus) this happens on the watch of the school. The Parent if informed should cooperate and communicate with the School Counselors Administrators and the Attendance Officer to correct the behavior. The Security and Attendance officer should take notice and tighten the belt. This is a security issue as well; there is no excuse for students coming and going outside of the lunch period and it is imperative that attendance irregularities be dealt with within 24 hours. This is easily done with our modern technology.

Instead, what we are seeing is the Attendance Officers documenting the absences as they accumulate and filing on the Parent and student when the number of absences are achieved.


Texas Public Education Watchdog Authority

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Driscoll's New Mayor Mike Perez bashed the aggressive police impound policy, "I'm totally against..


that."

Swearing in of new mayor & commissioner brings little political peace

The city of Driscoll swore in a new mayor and a new commissioner Wednesday night, but did little to quell the political drama that has shrouded the town for several years.

Mayor Mike Perez took his oath of office as more than 60 people watched inside the Nueces County Senior Community Center on 6th Street, replacing the man he defeated in a city election May 12th, Ted Ozuna.

Also sworn in, was Commissioner John Aguilar.

But, changing the political climate in Driscoll, will take time, and the resolution of some major questions. Among them, an ongoing civil Federal Lawsuit against former mayor Rolando Padilla, who has been accused of refurbishing the homes of city employees with public money, and not collecting past due water bills from supporters, in exchange for votes.

There are also ongoing questions about an aggressive police policy of impounding vehicles, apparently for profit, and rumors Perez plans to "clean house," and will terminate a number of city employees.

Wednesday, Perez denied the claim aired on a Corpus Christi TV station the night before, related to the rumored firings. Hinting of political payback, Perez said his accusor has never mentioned any such plans to him personally, and denied he planned on making wide-ranging changes. He also reiterated, "I didn't promise anything to anyone."

Perez also bashed the aggressive police impound policy, saying, "as far as pursuing and chasing down these people (the drivers frequently stopped on Highway 77 whose vehicles are impounded for infractions like driving without a license, proof of insurance, or violations of "in tow" regulations) , I'm totally against that." Perez also stated he would sit down with Police Chief Ben Zapata, to discuss his expectations for the department, and it's policies.

Aguilar offered no comment to 3-News Wednesday, and neither he nor Perez could speak about several ongoing lawsuits the city is involved, citing the advice of the city's attorneys on those cases.

But outgoing mayor Ted Ozuna did speak, saying the best way for the city to come together and move forward, was to bring those suits before a judge and jury.

Still, it did not appear Wednesday that the political bickering that has divided Driscoll would end anytime soon.

Supporters of Ozuna claimed Perez received a substantial amount of support and backing from Padilla, claims Perez dismissed. Perez told 3-News Padilla did assist him in printing signs for his campaign, but said that was the extent of any linkage between himself and the mayor whom Ozuna replaced.

There was also word from some in the crowd Wednesday, that a recall effort may begin against Perez almost immediately. A small group claimed his and Aguilar's election had been aided by voting irregularities, that voters who did not live in Driscoll took part in the May 12th election, and that other votes were cast by voters who had died before election day - claims 3-News has not yet been able to investigate.

http://www.kiiitv.com/home/7660497.html

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Corpus Christi's own Mel Klein looks at the largest proposed leveraged buyout in history with the practiced eye of an insider.

TXU courtship stirs investor's memories

By Elvia Aguilar Caller-Times
May 13, 2007


Local investor and entrepreneur Mel Klein looks at the largest proposed leveraged buyout in history with the practiced eye of an insider.

He knows that with the strength of the current financial market, buyouts of giant companies such as TXU will continue.

Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR), a private equity firm that has completed record buyouts and transactions, and TPG, another private equity firm, are pursuing purchase of TXU for a record $45 billion. Klein calls KKR "dean of the leveraged buyout business." Many an analyst would say the same, but his insight is personal. In 1976, over dinner at Rose & Joe's Italian Bakery in New York, Henry Kravis invited Klein to become a partner in KKR. They've kept in touch in the intervening years.

The present buyout bonanza is a convergence of a number of factors, Klein said.

"It's an extraordinary time in the financial history of the world. There is tremendous liquidity. There is a lot of money all around the world and relatively low interest rates," he said. "Private equity firms have been quite successful with a good return on their investments so people are eager to invest in them.

"Effectively, almost every public company is for sale."

For months and years now, people have been waiting for this cycle to end, but it hasn't happened, Klein said.

"There has been terrorist action, interest rates moving up significantly, a slowing housing economy and other factors, but it hasn't stopped the financial markets," he said. "In fact, the market is at record highs. Things are going well with the market."

Klein and H. Swint Friday, associate professor of finance at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, said leveraged buyouts are extremely profitable for investment bankers as well as company managers and CEOs.

"Some of these people think the valuation of their stock and company is below where it should be," Friday said. "They do their best to maximize the value of the company, but sometimes managers recognize a value that Wall Street does not see. The job of the investment banker is to find these under-valued companies and find investors to buy them. If they obtain cooperation from senior management and make an offer that no one can top, they buy it. "

Friday said one of the primary benefits of a private equity leveraged buyout for a company is that company officials no longer have to answer to the shareholders.

"They can take the company private and no longer have to do the annual reports and don't have to answer to the public about quarterly earnings," Friday said. "The thing with management and stakeholders is that everyone works in their own best interest, so you do have to wonder if sometimes these managers intentionally bring down the value of a company for their own financial gain."

The future of leveraged buyouts can be unlimited because the size and scale have grown exponentially in recent times, Klein said.

"If they continue to work, there's no reason why they shouldn't continue," he said. "If some start to have problems that may require some changes in certain ways, that doesn't mean that legislation won't alter some aspects of the way these deals operate. But I don't see anything on the horizon that would significantly impact the way these companies do business or change the financial landscape."

And just because the company goes private, doesn't mean it can't go public again.

"Investors buy these undervalued companies to make money and then as soon as they can, they will sell it or bring it back public," Klein said.

Looking back on that day 31 years ago when he was invited to join KKR, Klein realizes how his life would've been much different had he accepted. But the reason he said no - his wife Annette of 31 years - was well worth it.

"It was a five-hour dinner and Henry and I agreed on everything except where I would be living," Klein said. "I had just asked Annette to marry me and I had agreed to stay with her here in Corpus Christi."

Jerome Kohlberg, Jr., and cousins Henry Kravis and George R. Roberts, former Bear Stearns employees, founded KKR later that year. They had met Klein as a young investor on Wall Street during his tenure at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, an investment bank founded by William H. Donaldson, Dan Lufkin and Richard Jenrette in 1959. Klein and the KKR founders are among the pioneers of leveraged buyouts and private equity funds.

Klein went on to create his own list of accomplishments as founder of Melvyn N. Klein Interests, managing general partner of GKH Partners and president of JAKK Holding Corp.

"No, I don't regret it," he said of not joining KKR. "Had I done it, I would've spent all my time dealing with some of the issues that I imagine Henry and the others are having to go through. On some levels, it would've been nice, but it has been a wonderful 31 years with my wife."

The most recent action on the KKR and TPG transaction includes filing to the Public Utility Commission, Texas' public utilities regulator, detailing plans for TXU if the takeover deal goes ahead. KKR has completed more than 150 transactions with an enterprise value of more than $279 billion. As of Dec. 31, KKR's equity investments were valued at more than $74 billion on more than $30 billion of invested capital.

TXU's reputation has suffered in recent months, before and after the buyout offer was announced. Its plans to build new coal-fired plants, before the buyout proposal was known, had the backing of the governor but attracted opposition from disparate groups including environmentalists, business leaders and officials in major Texas cities. State investigators recently accused the company of manipulating prices upward during the summer of 2005, prompting legislators to call for stricter regulation of the electric market.

KKR, meanwhile, said many of the things that TXU's detractors - from the floor of the Legislature to the city halls of those major cities - wanted to hear. KKR promised a drastic cut in the coal expansion plan - from 11 plants to three - and more emphasis on clean, renewable sources. When TXU sought to use its generating capacity as leverage against the state's investigation, KKR repudiated it and TXU quickly backed down, saying it was a misunderstanding.

Klein said KKR is the perfect company to take over TXU.

"Henry Kravis is a man of tremendous integrity, ability and a person with outstanding values," Klein said. "These are people driven to apply the highest standards to everything they do and they do these things well. Putting aside financial success, I have respect for them as people and for maintaining their high standards and maintaining them all these years."

Klein said BECAUSE Kravis is from Tulsa, Okla., and Roberts is from Houston, the two partners have an understanding of the Southwest and probably have researched TXU thoroughly.

KKR has offices in New York, Menlo Park, London, Paris, Hong Kong, and Tokyo.

Leveraged buyout:

The acquisition of another company using a significant amount of borrowed money (bonds or loans) to meet the cost of acquisition. Often, the assets of the company being acquired are used as collateral for the loans in addition to the assets of the acquiring company. The purpose of leveraged buyouts is to allow companies to make large acquisitions without having to commit a lot of capital.

Source: Investopedia.com

Some of KKR's largest leveraged buyouts

# The first billion-dollar buyout transaction, Wometco Enterprises, 1984

# Several of the largest global buyout transactions, HCA, 2006 for $33B;

Capmark, 2006 for $16.7B;

SunGard, 2005 for $12B;

RJR Nabisco, 1989 for $31.4B;

Beatrice, 1986 for $8.7B

# The first buyout of a public company by tender offer, Malone & Hyde, 1984

# The largest leveraged buyout in Singapore, Avago Technologies, Inc., 2005, $2.8B

# The largest leveraged buyout in India, Aricent, 2006, $900 million

Source: KKR.com

Contact Elvia Aguilar at 886-3678 or aguilare@ caller.com.

Monday, May 7, 2007

Carlos Truan Relating to the establishment of a law school at Texas A&I University.

Bill: HB 1630
Legislative Session: 71(R) Author: Rangel
Add to Bill List
Sponsor
Truan

Bill: SB 646
Legislative Session: 71(R) Council Document: 71R 1835 MHT-D
Add to Bill List
Last Action:02/28/1989 S Reported favorably w/o amendments

Caption Version:Introduced
Caption Text:Relating to the establishment of a law school at Texas A&I University.

Author:Truan

Subjects:Education--Higher-- General (I0231)
TEXAS A&I UNIVERSITY (U2467)

Companion:HB 1630 by Rangel, Identical

Senate Committee:Education
Status:Out of committee
Vote:Ayes=9 Nays=1 Present Not Voting=0 Absent=1




Bill: HB 1630
Legislative Session: 71(R)
Add to Bill List
Primary Author Date Filed
Rangel


Coauthors (5) Date Signed On
Berlanga

Cuellar, Henry

Edwards, Al

Hunter, Todd

Lucio

Monday, April 30, 2007

CCISD's Scott Eliff Tells the Emperor he is Naked, "There's nothing exciting about getting ready for the TAKS test."


The Editorial Board recently interviewed Scott Elliff, finalist for superintendent of the Corpus Christi Independent School District. He is expected to be hired at tonight's board meeting. Elliff was accompanied by Louis Garza, board president. The comments have been edited for brevity and clarity.

Question: What do you bring to the position of superintendent?


<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://adsremote.scripps.com/event.ng/Type=click&FlightID=2033826&AdID=2041322&TargetID=2016958&Targets=2028094,2009209,2001053,2003385,2017031,2004033,2028619,2016958,2009540,2006392,2023725,2024418,2027983&RawValues=&Redirect=http:%2f%2fwww.advertisersite.com"><IMG SRC="http://images.scripps.com/1x1.gif" WIDTH=120 HEIGHT=600 BORDER=0></A>
Elliff: I bring the perspective of someone who knows this district inside and out as well as knowing some of the challenges that other districts around the country have faced and how they have worked through those. I bring an understanding of this community and a willingness to hear what the community's highest hopes and dreams are for our schools. I think I bring a solid knowledge of curriculum instruction.

Question: Knowing the district as you do, what needs to be worked on first?

Elliff: I think we've gotten a good start in the last two years on some important pieces that need to be finished. The district before 2003, when we had a curriculum audit, had no written curriculum for any of our subject areas. After several false starts, over a period of six months, with 400 teachers under the leadership of our staff, we were able to create curriculum guides for all of our core content areas, Pre-K through 12, English, math, science and social studies. The district had tried on two occasions to buy curriculums from other districts, because it was felt we wouldn't be able to do it. But our teachers showed it could be done.

What this really is, is the road map for what our teachers are supposed to teach in the classrooms in order for our kids to be successful. Without that, what the district essentially was doing was to give teachers a textbook and a list of objectives and say, "Good luck."

Now, 53 curriculum guides in core content areas have been developed; they are comprehensive.

The second big challenge is finding highly qualified teachers, particularly in mathematics and science. Starting with next year's freshman class, all students will have to take four years of math and science, in addition to four years of English, in order to graduate. That's going to put a press on us to be able to find the teachers to staff those classes.

Our district is only as good as our lowest-performing school. Right now, for a variety of reasons, Miller is our biggest challenge. We're taking some dramatic steps, some of which are required by law. We are reconstituting staff at the school. That is a big challenge for us. We know what we need to do. We know about strong instructional leadership, clear focus on mission, safety and security.

But there are things that impede the ability for those things to work. One is will. If you don't have the will to make changes, that's one. The other is sustainability. As a district, we've had considerable turnover. It's been difficult to keep people in key positions long enough for major reforms to take hold.

We've chosen to focus on a few things and keep doing them long enough that we believe they will make a difference. One is working on this curriculum and being relentless about our expectations that people will actually use the road map for instruction. The second is the relationship we have with the Schlechty Center for Leadership in School Reform (based in Kentucky) and what is called "Working on the Work." The curriculum guides are about what we're teaching. "Working on the Work" is about how we teach. We're in the third year of that program. Keeping some things in place long enough for them to take root is going to help us.

Question: You talk about the "will" to change. Do you have a mandate for change?

Elliff: There is a real sense of urgency to get some things fixed in terms of our academic performance, improving our graduation rate and getting our kids ready to go to college. I guess you can call that a mandate for change.

Our board hasn't established a set of goals yet. I have ideas and have articulated those to the board about things I think we need to be doing to be a world-class school district. But we all have to be on the same page about what that looks like. I had a conversation with a parent from Ray about whether I would be able to make tough decisions. Clearly, some things we need to change are going to make people feel uncomfortable; they are going to require people to think differently about what their roles are.

When it comes to making tough decisions, I'm trusting in the fact that the support I've gotten has been because people have seen who I am, and who we at the central office are, and they know we have their best interests at heart.

I'll give you an example of what needs to change. Our parental involvement and parent education program is all over the map. We don't have an organized, coherent strategy. We have people working very hard, but not in a way that is connected. A part of that is because we have people assigned out to every campus who have no connection to the whole. That's a support function that ought to be provided by the district and not left to chance. That's going to make people uncomfortable when we centralize that work.

Question: Are you going to have the autonomy to make decisions?

Elliff: Conversations I've had with board members lead me to believe that's the direction in which we'll be moving, particularly when it comes to personnel decisions. I've made it known that when it comes to selecting assistant principals and other posts, I don't see that as being within the realm of the board.

If the board is going to hold me accountable, then I need to be able to have people in key leadership positions who I believe can move forward with me as the leader of their team. That will require a change in policy. There's a policy that previous boards adopted that required certain positions to be taken to the board for action.

Question: Will you ask for that policy to be changed?

Elliff: I will.

Question: The school board approved the hiring of a Miller football coach the other night, so football coaches apparently are on the list of positions that require board approval.

Elliff: Yes, and assistant superintendents, executive directors, directors, athletic coordinators, principals and assistant principals are on that list. In some school districts, it's in the superintendent's contract that the board employs the superintendent, but the superintendent employs all other people.

Question: Is that what you're seeking?

Elliff: No. But, the existing policy reaches too far into the organization. I think there would be consent of the board on some positions, but I don't think the board needs to be voting on assistant principals or a football coach.

Louis Garza: I can't remember that we ever said "no" to any recommendation brought by the staff.

Question: Well, it doesn't work that way. What happens is that a trial balloon is floated and if the superintendent decides he doesn't have enough votes, the name is withdrawn. We know that goes on. We're advocating that you (Elliff) have the accountability so you can state your objectives and provide a report card to the community.

Elliff: Let me say something about that (accountability). If the state tells you you're doing a good job, they give you a label and that's the label you report out. I've come to believe parents aren't as gratified by "exemplary" and "recognized" as we are. I want us to develop - with input from the community to tell us what they're looking for - into a world-class system. There isn't anything that should keep us from being as highly regarded as a Plano or an Aldine (near Houston) or a Northside (in San Antonio.)

Question: Not long ago we had a debate in this community about dropouts. What would you do about dropouts?

Elliff: The district does not have a well-coordinated strategy to prevent dropouts. One thing in the next 100 days would be to bring that together and probably have a lot of activity working out of Coles High School. Coles is truly to be a center of options.

Question: Will we need to close more schools?

Elliff: I think we're going to take a serious look at facilities across the district. This may mean consolidating or replacing some aging facilities. We know because of the growth (on the Southside) that we're going to need a couple of elementary schools there sooner rather than later. There's going to have to be a question put to the community about how we do that.

Question: What do you see as impediments to your success?

Elliff: Low expectations. People have high hopes, but low expectations for our district. There is no reason we can't have a great system of schools. I'm not saying that money is the answer, but we're kind of static in terms of funding from the state. We don't get any less money than we got in 2005, but we don't get any more, either. That's going to present challenges.

If all we talk about is TAKS scores, then I think the focus on TAKS scores as an end in itself begins to eat away at the soul of what our organization is supposed to be about. There's nothing exciting about getting ready for the TAKS test.

Nick Jimenez is editorial page editor of the Caller-Times. Phone: 886-3787; e-mail: HYPERLINK mailto:jimenezn@caller.com jimenezn@caller.com.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Who is left to vote for After Round 1 Eliminations?

Corpus Christi City Election - Saturday, April 14, 2007


Mayor - unopposed Beach Thief

District 1

Unopposed Beach Thief


District 2

John Edward Marez*

Chad Magill - Who is Chad Magill?

Does he have any legitimate areas where he believes he can do a better JOB for City Council District #2?

Why is he compelled to challenge the only Incumbent who deserves a second term?


District 3

  • Priscilla Leal
  • Incumbent Beach Thief
  • Rene Saenz


District 4

  • Norm Baker
  • Guy Watts
  • Candidate Beach Thief
  • Mike McCutchon
  • Candidate Beach Thief
  • Danny D. Williams

District 5

  • Larry Elizondo (CCISD ENTRUSTee)
  • Roy Pell
  • Incumbent (spouse) Beach Thief


At Large

  • Incumbent Beach Thief

  • Nelda Martinez Beach Thief
  • Handsome Beach Thief
  • Incumbent Beach Thief
  • Arthur Brooks
  • ex Police Chief (Lencho Candidate)